Evolution is an undisputable fact and one can still believe in Evolution and God. New Zealand is a great example of Evolution. No mammals there except bats till people came along so all sorts of amazingly unique birds evolved and reptiles like the Tuatara still in existance where their kind went extinct long ago everywhere else. Look up the Tuatara -what an amazing creature. I want one for a pet! They don't even have teeth but projections on bone and can live to be over hundred years old. New Zealand today is sad though. All those unique creatures are on the verge of extinction due to the introduced species and the Moa and Haas eagle are long gone.
Can the Tasmanian Tiger still exist though? Maybe, just maybe and if not lets clone it back into existance, along with the Moa when the technology is available
Submitted by Anonymous2 (not verified) on Fri, 11 Jun 2010 - 7:14am
Ethan wrote:
New Zealand is a great example of Evolution. No mammals there except bats till people came along so all sorts of amazingly unique birds evolved and reptiles like the Tuatara still in existance where their kind went extinct long ago everywhere else. Look up the Tuatara -what an amazing creature. I want one for a pet! They don't even have teeth but projections on bone and can live to be over hundred years old.
More on this please. Beltin'. Love it. Interesting.
and if you go back farther time we evolved from fish that were chased by giant scorpions. So whenever you kill a scorpion its a little bit of revenge for our ancient ancestors.
I like to think we evolved from the Universe's equivalent of a pork scratching dropped in a pint of Guiness, with the pint being dark energy. Devastating at first, but with some interesting consequences.
Considering all life on earth evolved from a handful of microorganism after the Precambrian extinction (which was a rough 500 million years ago) and has been evolving ever since you could say, "yeah, we are pretty evolved". 500 million years is an awful long time to be at it you would think.
Unfortunately you would be forgetting that life had been around for 3 billion years before the beginning of the Cambrian and still hadn't managed to become more complex than the smallest piece of boot-wipe you can find nowadays.
So are we that evolved......maybe that all depends on your point of reference, and we don't seem to have any better than ourselves.
The Archbishop of Canterbury has no problem with evolution, nor does the pope (give or thke the odd wobble over the precise paleontological juncture when the human soul was injected), nor do educated priests and professors of theology. There is positive evidence that evolution is a fact.
There is ample evidence from opinion polls. More than 40 per cent of Yanks deny that humans evolved from other animals, and think that we - and by implication all of life - were created by God within the last 10,000 years. Should we be worried about the results of these polls? Is education a result of this sort of belief?
Submitted by YankWilliamsJr (not verified) on Mon, 7 Jun 2010 - 10:20am
The_elusive_STEALTH wrote:
There is ample evidence from opinion polls. More than 40 per cent of Yanks deny that humans evolved from other animals, and think that we - and by implication all of life - were created by God within the last 10,000 years. Should we be worried about the results of these polls? Is education a result of this sort of belief?
Should we be worried? I don't think so. Sure, there is a vein of fundamentalism in the U.S. Nobody denies this. Not particularly proud of it, but I ignore the nuts for the most part. What's your source, btw?
As I remember, a whole lot of people around the world list their religion as Jedi. I'm not too worried about that either.
Submitted by timedesign on Tue, 8 Jun 2010 - 1:08pm
talking about education, it is interesting to note that the countries with the highest standards of education are also the most atheistic (take a bow sweden) while the countries that deny universal education (yes, arab world, i'm talking about you) are the most zealous.
Submitted by Steve (not verified) on Mon, 7 Jun 2010 - 6:58am
Perhaps we were made by God as pre-human monkeys and then evolved from there? Funny how this subject is seen as only one or the other. God is still creating, through the evolutionary process. God will go on creating, whether we know it or not.
Submitted by timedesign on Tue, 8 Jun 2010 - 12:59pm
yeah, it's funny how this subject is seen as only one or the other after all the major mono-theistic have denounced (and burned people) for this way of thinking for centuries after Darwin produced his conclusions.
it seems even christianity is subject to Darwin's thinking.
Perhaps she is busy making new universes and training new prophets. Or maybe she is fighting the devil and coordinating offensive attacks on Hell in between meeting the pope for tea once a week.
Submitted by Thelonious (not verified) on Tue, 22 Jun 2010 - 5:02pm
Kinda would make him non-god if she/he were made nez pas? Scripture doesn't deny existance of persons on earth at the 'arrival' of adam / eve. their son Cain killed Bro.Able and was banished. Scripture says Cain goes to a "great city" and there he takes a wife. City wasn't result of evolution. Is it possible that it's being missed, the possiblity that creation of God's chosen, the Hebrew nation was the source of his plan for redemption. ??? I for one would rather live a good life thinking there is an after life, where all these perplexions can be revealed, than a poor life only to find out, i was wrong. just one man's thought.
Submitted by Higherlogic (not verified) on Wed, 5 Jan 2011 - 7:12pm
How about the beginning of life coming from a meteorite from some cosmos location instead of from random and infinite repeated cell divisions from blob to human? And perhaps God created the universe from which these materials were derived. Evolution is far from 'proven' and God can't be scientifically verified - so science and faith can't follow similar paths of credentialing.
I am willing to entertain the possibility that the initial seed of life came from outer space. However, I don't think that necessarily excludes evolution; they probably worked in tandem.
Further, I don't understand your comment that evolution is far from 'proven'. I was under the impression that it has been proven many times over.
Submitted by Higherlogic (not verified) on Thu, 6 Jan 2011 - 8:17am
I guess to be more scientifically oriented in my response I should say that no theory can be proven - the null hypothesis can only be rejected. Thus, no theory - evolution included - will never be proven. The relevant question is whether the preponderance of evidence does not reject the hypothesis that evolution is not the cause for the advancement of the human species. I believe the answer to that question is no, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to reject the null hypothesis. I think you need to study the empirical evidence before you talk about 'impressions'. Impressions don't count. God's intervention in human existence, as written in the old and new testament, and which can only be validated by the legal model of eyewitness testimony, provides a more believable explanation than that advanced by evolutionists. Creationists do not necessarily reject evolutionary adaptation of the species. They reject it as the explanation as to how we all got here. Thanks for your thoughts.
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 10 Nov 2012 - 12:17am
The world is extremely intricate.. So intricate that it'd be impossible for everything to evolve from just a simple cell or organism! I believe what is in the Bible, and the Bible is truth :)
Evolution
Evolution is an undisputable fact and one can still believe in Evolution and God. New Zealand is a great example of Evolution. No mammals there except bats till people came along so all sorts of amazingly unique birds evolved and reptiles like the Tuatara still in existance where their kind went extinct long ago everywhere else. Look up the Tuatara -what an amazing creature. I want one for a pet! They don't even have teeth but projections on bone and can live to be over hundred years old. New Zealand today is sad though. All those unique creatures are on the verge of extinction due to the introduced species and the Moa and Haas eagle are long gone.
Can the Tasmanian Tiger still exist though? Maybe, just maybe and if not lets clone it back into existance, along with the Moa when the technology is available
yes!
More on this please. Beltin'. Love it. Interesting.
Intelligent Design
I think there are some people who believe in God and evolution concurrently... They believe that God created the universe using evolution. I think.
has anyone told the pope?
has anyone told the pope?
we evolved from fish
and if you go back farther time we evolved from fish that were chased by giant scorpions. So whenever you kill a scorpion its a little bit of revenge for our ancient ancestors.
Accidental creation
I like to think we evolved from the Universe's equivalent of a pork scratching dropped in a pint of Guiness, with the pint being dark energy. Devastating at first, but with some interesting consequences.
Hilarious! Proof of
Hilarious! Proof of evolution, that comment.
so what
So what would be the vodka chaser from Murphy's on Cuba St?
Are we that evolved at all?
Are we that evolved at all?
Depends on whom you're asking ...
Considering all life on earth evolved from a handful of microorganism after the Precambrian extinction (which was a rough 500 million years ago) and has been evolving ever since you could say, "yeah, we are pretty evolved". 500 million years is an awful long time to be at it you would think.
Unfortunately you would be forgetting that life had been around for 3 billion years before the beginning of the Cambrian and still hadn't managed to become more complex than the smallest piece of boot-wipe you can find nowadays.
So are we that evolved......maybe that all depends on your point of reference, and we don't seem to have any better than ourselves.
Percentages.
The Archbishop of Canterbury has no problem with evolution, nor does the pope (give or thke the odd wobble over the precise paleontological juncture when the human soul was injected), nor do educated priests and professors of theology. There is positive evidence that evolution is a fact.
There is ample evidence from opinion polls. More than 40 per cent of Yanks deny that humans evolved from other animals, and think that we - and by implication all of life - were created by God within the last 10,000 years. Should we be worried about the results of these polls? Is education a result of this sort of belief?
Jedi mind tricks
Should we be worried? I don't think so. Sure, there is a vein of fundamentalism in the U.S. Nobody denies this. Not particularly proud of it, but I ignore the nuts for the most part. What's your source, btw?
As I remember, a whole lot of people around the world list their religion as Jedi. I'm not too worried about that either.
my source
None other than the great unbeliever Dick Dawkins.
talking about education, it
talking about education, it is interesting to note that the countries with the highest standards of education are also the most atheistic (take a bow sweden) while the countries that deny universal education (yes, arab world, i'm talking about you) are the most zealous.
Perhaps we were made by God
Perhaps we were made by God as pre-human monkeys and then evolved from there? Funny how this subject is seen as only one or the other. God is still creating, through the evolutionary process. God will go on creating, whether we know it or not.
good point
so which way did you vote?
yeah, it's funny how this
yeah, it's funny how this subject is seen as only one or the other after all the major mono-theistic have denounced (and burned people) for this way of thinking for centuries after Darwin produced his conclusions.
it seems even christianity is subject to Darwin's thinking.
Hang on
If God created us then who... created God? Does God have a God?
or what if god is dead?
or what if god is dead? haven't heard much out of her recently.
perhaps
Perhaps she is busy making new universes and training new prophets. Or maybe she is fighting the devil and coordinating offensive attacks on Hell in between meeting the pope for tea once a week.
Kinda would make him non-god
Kinda would make him non-god if she/he were made nez pas? Scripture doesn't deny existance of persons on earth at the 'arrival' of adam / eve. their son Cain killed Bro.Able and was banished. Scripture says Cain goes to a "great city" and there he takes a wife. City wasn't result of evolution. Is it possible that it's being missed, the possiblity that creation of God's chosen, the Hebrew nation was the source of his plan for redemption. ??? I for one would rather live a good life thinking there is an after life, where all these perplexions can be revealed, than a poor life only to find out, i was wrong. just one man's thought.
How about the beginning of
How about the beginning of life coming from a meteorite from some cosmos location instead of from random and infinite repeated cell divisions from blob to human? And perhaps God created the universe from which these materials were derived. Evolution is far from 'proven' and God can't be scientifically verified - so science and faith can't follow similar paths of credentialing.
I am willing to entertain the
I am willing to entertain the possibility that the initial seed of life came from outer space. However, I don't think that necessarily excludes evolution; they probably worked in tandem.
Further, I don't understand your comment that evolution is far from 'proven'. I was under the impression that it has been proven many times over.
I guess to be more
I guess to be more scientifically oriented in my response I should say that no theory can be proven - the null hypothesis can only be rejected. Thus, no theory - evolution included - will never be proven. The relevant question is whether the preponderance of evidence does not reject the hypothesis that evolution is not the cause for the advancement of the human species. I believe the answer to that question is no, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to reject the null hypothesis. I think you need to study the empirical evidence before you talk about 'impressions'. Impressions don't count. God's intervention in human existence, as written in the old and new testament, and which can only be validated by the legal model of eyewitness testimony, provides a more believable explanation than that advanced by evolutionists. Creationists do not necessarily reject evolutionary adaptation of the species. They reject it as the explanation as to how we all got here. Thanks for your thoughts.
Creation
The world is extremely intricate.. So intricate that it'd be impossible for everything to evolve from just a simple cell or organism! I believe what is in the Bible, and the Bible is truth :)
Seize the skull!
(Add a new comment)